Your input will directly inform the architecture options for the GovAI Program's learning and development platforms. There are no right or wrong answers — we're interested in your honest experience.
⏱ Approximately 15–20 minutes
✓
Thank you for your input
Your responses have been submitted to the GovAI Architecture Review team. A member of the RockMouse team may be in touch if they have any follow-up questions.
Prepared by RockMouse for the GovAI Program · 2026
Form progress
0%
About you
Your Details
Please enter your name
Please enter your role
Please enter your agency
Section A
Your Role & Context
~5 min
What content or services do you own or support? How often are you in the platforms vs. working around them?
What is working? What is not? What would be the first thing you would fix?
Section B
Current Platforms
~15 min
GovTEAMS / Knowledge Hub
ILE
GovAI Chat / MKDocs
Usage, SSO issues, ease of content management, analytics — and what would break if it was removed?
Who manages it? Is the open-source model sustainable? GovTEAMS SSO integration — any issues?
Permanent or pilot? VanGuard vs GovTEAMS SSO — is this a problem? How should it eventually interact with the other platforms?
Section C
User Experience & Demand
~10 min
APS generalists vs. tech-specialist roles? Accessibility? Mobile usage? Any groups who struggle to access content?
Content discovery, authentication issues, performance, inconsistency across platforms?
Any personalised or recommended learning? Do people drop off after one module?
Section D
Analytics & Measurement
~5 min
Completion rates, time-on-task, agency/role breakdowns? How do you demonstrate value to the Program?
What would that data enable you to do differently?
Section E
Future Direction
~5 min
Single platform or best-of-breed? AI-native vs. traditional LMS? What does success look like?
Cost blow-out? Vendor lock-in? User abandonment? What would be unrecoverable?
Known constraints? Pending decisions? Stakeholder sensitivities?